Research group

SPARK Lab

Safe and Principled AI for Reasoning and Knowledge

Our lab focuses on making AI models safe and aligned. We study how foundation models comprehend intent, govern knowledge, and behave accountably in real-world settings.

People

Our Team

Researchers working together to build safer, more principled, and more accountable AI systems.

Direction 01

AI Safety & Privacy

Giving people and institutions practical control over what models learn, retain, reveal, and refuse.

Teaser figure for CALIBURN: Self-Calibrated LLM Unlearning Alignment
EMNLP 2026

CALIBURN: Self-Calibrated LLM Unlearning Alignment

CALIBURN turns a model's confidence in undesirable knowledge into a precise unlearning signal. The method improves the balance between targeted forgetting and general capability preservation while reducing dependence on large retention datasets.

LLM unlearningalignment
Teaser figure for DUO: Practical LLM Unlearning for Child Safety via Data and Optimization Co-Design
NeurIPS 2026 Workshop on Child Safety in AI

DUO: Practical LLM Unlearning for Child Safety via Data and Optimization Co-Design

DUO introduces KidBoundary, a benchmark of 230 semantic triplets pairing unsafe targets with benign neighbors and adversarial reformulations. Its data and optimization co-design combines unified QA representations, contrastive anchors, and bidirectional Top-K distillation to improve child safety without over-refusing legitimate questions.

child safetymulti-objective unlearning
Teaser figure for DUET: Distilled LLM Unlearning from an Efficiently Contextualized Teacher
ICLR 2026

DUET: Distilled LLM Unlearning from an Efficiently Contextualized Teacher

DUET distills the behavior of a prompt-steered teacher into a durable student model. It combines the precision of in-context unlearning with the robustness of model updates, achieving strong forgetting and utility preservation with substantially less training data.

knowledge distillationefficient learning
Teaser figure for Hierarchical Federated Unlearning for Large Language Models
FedKDD 2025

Hierarchical Federated Unlearning for Large Language Models

This work studies continuous, heterogeneous unlearning requests over decentralized and sensitive data. Task-specific adapters and hierarchical merging reduce interference between forgetting and retention objectives while preserving privacy and scalability.

federated unlearningprivacy
Teaser figure for Web Intellectual Property at Risk
EMNLP 2025

Web Intellectual Property at Risk

Web IP at Risk examines how retrieval-enabled language models can reproduce protected online content in real time. It introduces a creator-oriented defense framework that disrupts unauthorized extraction while preserving normal access for human readers.

web securityintellectual property
Direction 02

Reasoning & Learning

Building models that learn from strong supervision efficiently and sustain reliable reasoning beyond the training distribution.

Teaser figure for Distribution Corrected Offline Data Distillation for Large Language Models
Efficient Reasoning @ COLM 2026

Distribution Corrected Offline Data Distillation for Large Language Models

DISCORD corrects the train-test distribution gap in offline reasoning distillation. By emphasizing teacher supervision that better matches the student's own inference distribution, it improves mathematical reasoning while keeping training efficient and stable.

reasoningoffline distillation
Teaser figure for DUET: Distilled LLM Unlearning from an Efficiently Contextualized Teacher
ICLR 2026

DUET: Distilled LLM Unlearning from an Efficiently Contextualized Teacher

DUET distills the behavior of a prompt-steered teacher into a durable student model. It combines the precision of in-context unlearning with the robustness of model updates, achieving strong forgetting and utility preservation with substantially less training data.

knowledge distillationefficient learning
Direction 03

Agentic AI for Science Discovery

Developing AI collaborators that can reason over domain knowledge, algorithms, and evidence with research-level rigor.

Teaser figure 1 for Can LLMs Prove Robotic Path Planning Optimality? Teaser figure 2 for Can LLMs Prove Robotic Path Planning Optimality?
IEEE IROS 2026

Can LLMs Prove Robotic Path Planning Optimality?

This benchmark asks whether language models can construct research-level approximation proofs for robotic path-planning algorithms. Its 34 proof tasks reveal persistent logical gaps and show how targeted domain lemmas can improve rigorous mathematical reasoning.

roboticsalgorithm verification
Direction 04

Model Evaluation & Benchmarking

Designing demanding evaluations that expose hidden failure modes across safety, mathematical proof, and multimodal understanding.

Teaser figure 1 for Can LLMs Prove Robotic Path Planning Optimality? Teaser figure 2 for Can LLMs Prove Robotic Path Planning Optimality?
IEEE IROS 2026

Can LLMs Prove Robotic Path Planning Optimality?

This benchmark asks whether language models can construct research-level approximation proofs for robotic path-planning algorithms. Its 34 proof tasks reveal persistent logical gaps and show how targeted domain lemmas can improve rigorous mathematical reasoning.

roboticsalgorithm verification
Teaser figure for Sports Intelligence: Assessing Sports Understanding from Text to Video
arXiv 2024

Sports Intelligence: Assessing Sports Understanding from Text to Video

Sports Intelligence evaluates language and video-language models across rules, history, context-specific reasoning, and multimodal sports understanding. The benchmark and error analysis expose where current models fall short on dynamic, knowledge-rich scenarios.

multimodal evaluationsports AI
Teaser figure for DUO: Practical LLM Unlearning for Child Safety via Data and Optimization Co-Design
NeurIPS 2026 Workshop on Child Safety in AI

DUO: Practical LLM Unlearning for Child Safety via Data and Optimization Co-Design

DUO introduces KidBoundary, a benchmark of 230 semantic triplets pairing unsafe targets with benign neighbors and adversarial reformulations. Its data and optimization co-design combines unified QA representations, contrastive anchors, and bidirectional Top-K distillation to improve child safety without over-refusing legitimate questions.

child safetymulti-objective unlearning
Direction 05

Generative AI Applications

Translating principled model behavior into useful, human-centered systems for health, wellbeing, and everyday decision support.

Teaser figure for ChatWise: AI-Powered Conversations for Senior Cognitive Wellbeing
SciSocLLM @ KDD 2025

ChatWise: AI-Powered Conversations for Senior Cognitive Wellbeing

ChatWise is a strategy-guided conversational system for older adults. Its dual-level reasoning framework combines long-horizon conversational planning with responsive utterance generation to support engaging, cognitively meaningful interactions.

conversational AIhealth and wellbeing